• Return to the NUCR Website
  • #sotu


    The most disappointing part of the State of the Union was that John Boehner was not wearing his signature orange tie to bring out the beautiful glow in his face. The most exciting part was not knowing what Joe Biden might do next. It was hard to look away from everyone's favorite pair, Orange John and Crazy Uncle Joe. When you did, you realized the most powerful man in the world was trying to say something.

    The State of the Union is one of my least favorite traditions, no matter what president is behind that podium. It means so little, but everyone cares so much. We all knew exactly what President Obama was going to say days before the speech happened. Regardless of my complaining, I, of course, did watch the event.

    What's most important to realize is that we all have the exact same goals. I want the income gap to tighten, women to find equality, and to bring back the American dream of equal opportunity. In the midst of intense bipartisanship, it is always important to realize that. What we don't agree on is how to get there.

    President Obama faces a tough few years. I like to hope that we can find common ground and accomplish our goals, but I'm too much of a realist for that. What scares me, though, is that this stalemate is going to lead to executive orders. A lot of Republicans have been critiquing Obama for this and I agree with them. I will say, though, I hate executive orders even when I agree with the President, a sentiment not wholly shared with my party. 

    Ted Cruz wrote an editorial in the WSJ about Obama's Imperial Presidency. That is not the problem. The problem is THE imperial presidency. Since the days of FDR, every president has expanded its powers in ways contrary to our constitution and system of checks and balances. This is something people on all sides should be freaking out about! Yes, Congress is annoying and slow, but that is our best chance. With executive orders, one guy and his unelected cabinet are making decisions for this nation. George W. was one of the worst abusers of these powers. That is not okay. The fact that Obama wants to expand this power is beyond worrisome. I desperately hope Obama (and Republicans in Congress) will recognize this and some how work together just a little bit more.

    After the speech, we were graced with a fire site chat from Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers. The setting of the event got some criticism, which is fine because it was exceptionally awkward. I do think McMorris Rodgers did her job, but what bothered me was that job did not include any substance. I am all for saying everything the Democrats do is wrong, but we look horrible when that statement is not followed with actual policy. What is our solution to healthcare? What do we want to do for women and families? How will we fix income inequality. The Democrats are wrong, but why are we right? Until we fix the way we approach criticism our party will remain unsuccessful. 

    This State of the Union, like all others will be remembered as inconsequential. When we do this in a year we will all tune in for the same reason, the John & Joe show. 

    Why We Need John McCain

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/arizona-gop-censures-mccain-for-liberal-record/2014/01/25/939f1bcc-862e-11e3-aff8-191f8d178325_story.html

    The Arizona Republican Party has officially censured Senator John McCain stating that he is insufficiently conservative. Although plenty of people have acknowledged that no further action will be taken and that silly resolutions pass at these meetings frequently, this is not good for our party. Worse, the resolution condemns his association with liberal Democrats.

    This disappoints me on many levels. While I may not agree with Senator McCain on all of his views, I respect him for getting things done. His willingness to compromise and work with the other side is the little efficiency left in Congress. If the Republican Party starts to censure politicians like him, we will get no where. I understand the importance of party members who will fight for the conservative agenda with or without victory, but we also need a working government. Senator McCain is one of those people who helps make that happen. It worries me that working with Democrats has become a sin in our party. I see the ability to work with the other side critical to our success in the next election.

    Interestingly, if you check the sponsorship record of Senator McCain it falls to the right of Senator Ted Cruz (https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/ted_cruz/412573). And, man, when I think of Ted Cruz, I think liberal! I hope the Arizona Republican Party recognizes this and resolutions censuring Senator Cruz for his liberalness follow soon. McCain's Arizona colleague, Jeff Flake, has a more liberal sponsorship record making me wonder why we should isolate one of our party leaders? Censure them all!

    I also know that this resolution does not represent the view of the party as the whole, but unfortunately for us, that is not always a distinction the average person makes. This resolution reflects poorly on the Republican Party and I refuse to be associated with it. Senator McCain gives me hope that we can push forward a conservative agenda by working with the other party and, yes, compromising. He recognizes that our absence in the White House means we have to make extra efforts and I hope more Republicans follow his lead.

    Immigration Reform



    It is the time for Republicans to step up to the table and figure out comprehension immigration reform. Now that we have postponed spending crises and default threats for a bit, Republicans have the opportunity and time to lead a real proposal.

    http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303448204579338984187207834?mod=WSJ_Opinion_MIDDLESecond

    Whole Foods and Englewood?


    The Chicago Sun Times reported that the Chicago Plan Commission has approved the retail portion for building a Whole Foods in Chicago’s Englewood neighborhood.[1] Mayor Rahm Emanuel announced the store in early September as a way to invest in Englewood and “address a pressing need for fresh, healthy food”.[2] The store will create about 100 jobs for the community and make healthier foods more accessible in this identified food dessert.

    Mayor Emmanuel has succeeded in bringing business to a Chicago neighborhood that is notoriously crime riddled and depressed, but Whole Foods might not be the right solution. Englewood has an average income of $11,993, less than half of the average income in Chicago. Poverty levels and unemployment are rising and the neighborhood finds itself near the top of rankings involving crime, homicides, and project households.[3]

    The community is in dire need of business and it is impressive that Mayor Emmanuel has succeeded in this project. That being said, Whole Foods and Englewood are not the perfect pair.  Whole Foods is known as an overpriced grocery store found in over developed suburbs. A price check conducted by Chicago Business in response to the announcement of Englewood’s Whole Foods shows that this stereotype is evident in Whole Food’s consistently higher prices for basic goods.[4]

    In a community with high unemployment and little money, there is reason to be skeptical that people will be willing to pay Whole Foods’ prices for basic groceries like milk, eggs, and bread. An option for fresh produce offers a potential relief to this area. The question remains: Will consumers choose this option?

    Whole Foods has offered strategies for how they are going to make this branch attractive to consumers. Vice President for strategic operations, Bridget Jones, has said they will make prices competitive and base this store off the success of the Detroit branch.[5] Whole Foods will alter some prices, but the store hopes to convince consumers that they are paying similar prices for better products.[6] Detroit’s Whole Foods was built on a parallel platform and seems to have seen some success. The cheap rent and lack of similar competition gives the store an edge while helping the local community.[7] As Whole Foods CEO Walter Robb mentions, ignored neighborhoods deserve accessibility to healthier foods.[8]

    It is refreshing to see a business take a chance in a neighborhood that needs economic prosperity through private enterprises. Whether Whole Foods is the right store to make its way to Englewood is still up for debate, but hopefully other stores will follow to bring jobs and prosperity to Chicago’s neighborhoods that it need most.



    [1] http://www.suntimes.com/23914025-761/whole-foods-gets-ok-to-set-up-shop-in-englewood.html
    [2] http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local/Whole-Foods-To-Open-Chicago-Englewood-222316211.html
    [3] http://www.marketplace.org/topics/wealth-poverty/guns-and-dollars/economic-breakdown-chicagos-englewood-neighborhood
    [4] http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20130905/NEWS07/130909929/milk-money-comparing-prices-at-whole-foods-rivals
    [5] http://www.suntimes.com/23914025-761/whole-foods-gets-ok-to-set-up-shop-in-englewood.html
    [6] http://www.wbez.org/sections/food/whole-foods-plans-replicate-detroit-success-englewood-109140
    [7] http://www.mlive.com/business/detroit/index.ssf/2013/08/whole_foods_ceo_tells_bloomber.html
    [8] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/04/whole-foods-in-englewood-chicago_n_3866129.html